Skip to content

Guidance and support in care funding

Read this if your relative is about to be discharged from hospital into care…

Please note: This article was published prior to January 2024, and some information may be outdated.

Is your relative about to be discharged from hospital into care?

In this article we take a look back over the last 10 years to see how the NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) process upon discharge from hospital has changed, and how it can benefit your relative, so they don’t miss out on their entitlement to CHC Funding.

Firstly, a quick overview of the process:

The position in 2013

When posting our blog, What to do if your relative is in hospital and needs full time care (28 March 2013), we wrote that many patients were being discharged from hospital too soon in order to free up hospital beds and in an effort to save the NHS money.

Hospital staff were not always aware that CHC Funding existed i.e. all the patient’s ongoing healthcare needs once back in a community setting could be paid for in full by the NHS, FREE of charge. So a quick discharge often meant patients went without any NHS assessment for CHC Funding being undertaken and then missing out of CHC Funding as a consequence.

Alternatively, patients were effectively told not to worry as they would be assessed for CHC once out of hospital. This deft move by the NHS shifted the responsibility for paying for care over to the patient’s local authority instead where they would be subjected to means-testing. If their means were above the local authority threshold, patients were forced to pay for their own care privately in the meantime until it was decided one day that they needed a CHC assessment and proper arrangements could be put in place to meet their long-term healthcare needs.

So, to avoid being pressured into a quick discharge from hospital and to protect a patient’s right to a CHC assessment, we suggested they ‘bed block’ and insisted on an assessment for NHS Continuing Healthcare as leverage before being discharged from hospital. The message was clear – sit tight and hold on to your hospital bed as a tactical bargaining chip until an assessment for CHC Funding had been done – because, once discharged, it was far harder to get CHC Funding.

However, with the passage of time and the COVID pandemic years later, that tactical thinking has been superseded and is no longer appropriate.

The position in 2018

In October 2018, the NHS National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare modified its assessment process. It was no longer considered appropriate to be assessed for CHC Funding whilst in hospital (save in exceptional circumstances).

Assessing in an acute hospital environment at a time of ultimate vulnerability was felt unsafe and unlikely to maximise the patient’s potential for recovery.

If a patient was assessed in hospital before they had reached optimal recovery, it could mean that their longer-term needs might be substantially under or over-prescribed – producing a package of NHS funded care that was either grossly inadequate to meet their intermediate or long-term healthcare needs, or conversely, unduly generous and unnecessary (at the NHS’s wasted expense).

The 2018 National Framework indicated that assessments in an acute hospital setting may not necessarily give an accurate picture of a patient’s intermediate or long-term healthcare needs – especially, as with appropriate support and opportunity, the patient has the potential to recover further in the near future.

So, the updated 2018 NHS National Framework indicated that it would now be more effective to carry out CHC assessments promptly upon discharge and without delay in a community setting e.g. when the patient returned to their own home or were established in a care home and after there was a period of recovery to monitor and assess the situation (known as ‘Discharge to Assess’). Only then, following a period of optimisation, could a clearer and more accurate picture of ongoing healthcare needs be properly ascertained.

Therefore, the old rouse of holding on to your hospital bed as a negotiating leverage to get a CHC assessment done sooner became obsolete and contrary to the new 2018 National Framework.

The position in 2020

However, all that changed again with the onset of COVID in early 2020.

NHS hospitals were inundated with acute cases and were understandably trying to free up hospital beds as quickly as possible to accommodate the number of sick patients needing urgent medical treatment.

From 1st September 2020, the Government introduced an automatic package of free care funding (via the NHS) for up to 6 weeks after discharge from hospital as an incentive to free up hospital beds and give patients reablement, rehabilitation or sub-acute care and arrangements – including intermediate care or an interim package of support – whilst waiting to be assessed for CHC Funding for their longer-term healthcare needs. The rationale, as set out in the National Framework, was that there should be no gap in the care being received. If the assessment and decision-making process took longer than 6 weeks, the NHS (and/or local authority) were obligated to make arrangements to continue to fund ongoing care until the matter had been determined.

Discharged from hospital to a care home? Is your relative getting their entitlement to 6 weeks’ free care?

Did you know that if you have been discharged from hospital after 1st September 2020 you may be entitled to free NHS care?

As COVID started to subside, key personnel within CHC Departments returned from the front line back to their usual duties to catch up with CHC backlogs, assessments and appeals. With more staff available and the staffing crisis starting to regain normality, with effect from 1st July 2021, the 6-week automatic Government funding package post-discharge was reduced from 6 weeks to just 4 weeks. This put immense pressure on the NHS to carry out their assessments promptly and efficiently in order to avoid being personally responsible for the cost of ongoing care until the patient’s assessment had been finalised.

Why aren’t you getting free NHS care?

The position in 2022

The 4-week Government discharge funding finally ended on 31 March 2022.

However, even though it is no longer official Government policy, we understand that some ICBs have continued the policy of providing 4 weeks of funding to assist patients whilst assessment is pending post-discharge from hospital.

The latest edition of the NHS National Framework came into effect on 1st July 2022.

The Discharge to Assess principles are broadly the same as the 2018 National Framework, namely that CHC assessments should not take place in an acute hospital setting (except In rare circumstances). However, the 2022 National Framework also adds that CHC assessments should be delayed until after discharge from hospital in order to provide for a further period of time for timely and appropriate recovery support, e.g. therapy or rehabilitation if needed, to try and reach an end point of recovery before assessment – so that a more accurate picture of the patient’s longer-term needs can be seen.

The key message now is – assessments at the right place and the right time. This means that, in the vast majority of cases, this will be following discharge and after a period of recovery in a familiar setting or intermediate/rehabilitation placement.

Of course, for the NHS that could represent huge savings by not having to pay for a patient’s full-time care and accommodation in a care home, as soon as they leave hospital, if they can be rehabilitated and make a quicker recovery with assistance. As there must be no gap in the provision of appropriate support to meet the individual’s needs, these interim services should continue until it has been decided whether or not the individual has a need for NHS Continuing Healthcare. However, the assessment process has been further modified in the latest 2022 edition of the National Framework.

We recommend you read paragraphs 101 to 108 -“Understanding how NHS Continuing Healthcare interacts with Hospital Discharge”. Set out below, for ease of reference, are some salient paragraphs from the updated 2022 NHS National Framework. It provides for 5 different scenarios (pathways) upon discharge from hospital as follows:

“107. In the vast majority of cases, CHC assessments should take place in community settings. There may be rare circumstances where assessments may take place in an acute hospital environment. In addition, ICBs and their partner organisations should ensure appropriate processes and pathways exist for individuals who may have a need for NHS Continuing Healthcare, for example:

(a) where the individual has an existing package or placement which all relevant parties agree can still safely and appropriately meet their needs without any changes, then they should be discharged back to this placement and/or package under existing funding arrangements. In such circumstances any screening for NHS Continuing Healthcare, if required, should take place within six weeks of the individual returning to the place from which they were admitted to hospital. If this screening results in a full assessment of eligibility and the individual is found eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare through this particular assessment, then any necessary re-imbursement should apply back to the date of discharge;

(b) a decision is made to provide interim NHS-funded services to support the individual after discharge. This may allow individuals to reach a better point of recovery and rehabilitation in the community before their longer-term needs are assessed. In such a case, before the interim NHS-funded services come to an end, screening, if required, for NHS Continuing Healthcare should take place through use of the Checklist and, where appropriate, the full MDT process using the DST (i.e. an assessment of eligibility);

(c) a ‘negative’ Checklist is completed in an acute hospital (i.e. the person does not have a need for NHS Continuing Healthcare);

(d) a ‘positive’ Checklist is completed in an acute hospital and interim NHS-funded services are put in place to support the individual after discharge until it is either determined that they no longer require a full assessment (because a further Checklist has been completed which is now negative) or a full assessment of eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare is completed;

(e) a ‘positive’ Checklist is completed in acute hospital and a full assessment of eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare takes place before discharge. In a small number of circumstances, it may be decided to go directly to a full assessment within the acute hospital, without the need for a Checklist. ICBs are reminded that if an individual’s needs change in a short time frame between a positive Checklist and a full assessment of eligibility taking place, it is legitimate to undertake a second Checklist, rather than necessarily proceeding to full assessment of eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare. The individual should be kept fully informed of the changed position.”

For further reading:

Hospital discharge and community support guidance (updated 01.07.22)

Things You Need To Check Before Your Relative Is Discharged From Hospital

If you need help with your relative’s assessment for CHC post-discharge from hospital, contact us by email enquries@caretobedifferent.co.uk or visit our website for more helpful information.

Share this article

3 Comments

3 responses to “Read this if your relative is about to be discharged from hospital into care…”

  1. My father in law was finally discharged from hospital to a care home in October 2022. He had been in hospital on and off (mostly on) since July 2022 He has schizophrenia, psychosis and depression. He is still in care. He has still not had a CHC assessment and I am currently arguing with the ICB as to who is responsible for paying for care since his discharge. I am at a loss to understand the relationship between para 106 of the National Framework and the law. Para 106 appears to allow discretion as to whether or not the NHS should fund a package of care after hospital discharge until a CHC assessment is able to be done. So that is arbitrary. But the law states that it is illegal for the local authority to fund care which should in fact be funded by the NHS . And this cannot be decided until a CHC assessment has been carried out. My understanding from CTBD, Prof. Clements and other sources was that the NHS was legally responsible for care until it was decided otherwise by the CHC assessment. But that is not what paras. 101 -108 seem to be saying-in the usual woolly fashion.

    • You could try to insist that there is an NHS ‘appropriate clinician’ over seeing and directing care (not a GP as they are not skilled in or responsible for care, especially mental health care). There should have been one involved if you managed to get a council care assessment.
      Regardless of entitlement to nursing-funded care or continuing health care, ALL are entitled to properly delegated health care. NB the NHS has a duty to provide Mental health care with equal regard to physical care.
      This ‘appropriate clinician’ could be an occupational therapist, Social worker or Nurse. They should assess and provide care plans to direct the care home in healthcare and provide resources for this??. For example, if your FIL needs a mental health nurse or occupational therapist the NHS should provide one or pay for one with personal health budgets. It is not good enough for them to assume the social care providers are willing and able to provide the NHS care as well as the social care (washing, dressing, feeding, transporting) that they are registered, regulated and responsible for.
      CHC is purely for the social care workers (& accommodation if best place to receive the care) when the standard NHS community services cannot meet the health care needs of a person with the ‘low’! level of healthcare that is ‘allowed’ to be delegated to care homes. Insist on health professional care plans to identify what health care the home is expected to be providing then ask the ICB to fund it with NHS personal health budgets, these are different to means tested council social care budgets. I am guessing the home is expected to be providing mental health nursing care, and occupational therapy to rehabilitate, if a secure care home is needed then I would question if this is not the same as a mental health hospital – If the local council/NHS are treating care homes like mental health hospitals without providing the direction and support and resources of the appropriate health services, then they need to be shot!

      I wonder if this has been tried and if there are any successful legal cases to refund the proportion of care home fees that can be proved to be health care (rather than social care). Most of the cases seem to be disputes between what the care the council funds vs the NHS. I’m not clear on council responsibility for providing/funding mental health care and preventative health care.

      Alternatively (I am kidding with this so please don’t!) take him out and sit on a park bench for him to be found and sectioned under the mental health act so all care and after care is paid for.
      I do appreciate that this is minimising a really difficult situation and properly not helpful – please don’t quote me – I am not registered or regulated to give legal advice or health/social care advice or any advice – just as social care providers are not regulated to provide health care as they do not employ health care professionals.

      • Thanks Steph, I missed you post completely I’m afraid, so a lot of time in replying. My FIL’s care was in fact being overseen by the prescribing psychiatrist and the Mental Health Team from October 2022. That is until June 2023 when his psychiatrist removed himself and the mental health Team’s oversight and discharged him to primary care, despite my protests. This was immediately after I had spoken with the Director of Adult social services but more importantly, the ICB Chief Nurse and her deputy, the latter being not only the decision maker in his CHC application but also the person responsible forICB CHC funds. Conflict of Interest?? They had still by then not arranged for a CHC assessment and it did not take place until October, one year on from when he was transferred direct from hospital to a care home. I regard this as skulduggery because it would mean, and did mean, that for the 3 month period before the assessment, he would have been in primary care and not under the Mental health team. This is completely contrary to the GMC aand Royal College of Psychiatrists guidelines. Having been turned down for CHC, I have now had to apply on appeal to NHS England for an assessment. In the meantime, I have paid about £111,000 to the social services and care home combined. The best farce is that I have just found out that my FIL has never been in local authority care because he has more than £23.250 and I did not ask under S.18 Care Act for the LA to take him into care, despite him being unable to do most of the tasks under the Care Act. Well I did not ask because I had assumed that since he was transferred direct and social services were thereafter heavily involved and paid care fees for more than a year, that he was in care. You are not going to ask for something to be done which you think has already been done. Neither the ICB nor the LA informed us that he was not in care.

Leave a Reply to nigel duckworth Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form, you agree to the data handling as stated in our Privacy Policy.